When an artificial intelligence (AI)-generated painting won first place in an art competition at the Colorado State Fair in September, a debate quickly erupted over whether AI-generated work should be considered art. .
Winner Jason Allen said that when he submitted his work to the competition in the Digital Art/Digitally Processed Photography category, he showed that his work was created by AI.
“Art is dead, dude. It’s over. AI won. Humans lost,” Allen said new york times in an interview.
read more:
Can Robots Take Your Job? How Automation Will Change the Future of Work
read more
-
![]()
Can Robots Take Your Job? How Automation Will Change the Future of Work
The picture in question was created with Midjourney, a text-to-image generator that converts text prompts into digital art. After the user enters a text prompt, the algorithm generates assets based on a database of existing images and artwork.
Users usually enter some keywords to describe what they want the image to look like. Based on them, AI creates digital drawings. According to Midjourney’s user manual, you can further customize the image by entering other advanced commands.
Midjourney is not the only text-to-image generator. There are other programs with similar results, such as DALL E, Nightcafe, and Starryai. But the controversy surrounding it has pushed technology to the forefront of debates about what it means to create art and, most importantly, what art is.
Speaking to Global News, the Canadian artist said there is still a long way to go before AI can actually replace artists and designers, and while the images generated by AI are impressive, He said it lacked “humanity”.
This is especially true when it comes to concept art created for companies, says Olivia Hamza, concept artist at Montreal-based company Panache Digital Games.
“What we do[as concept artists]is actually a lot more complicated than just drawing, and often people only see the final, polished version of the product, so You don’t look at it from an outside perspective,” Hamza says.
“We communicate with different departments on a daily basis and have to find a way to harmonize the needs of all sections into one design. So AI can do this for the enterprise. I don’t think it’s time.”
Hamza says it took artists and designers years to learn how to organize images to convey a very specific mood or message.
“All of this takes years of practice. It takes at least seven years to learn how to draw, and then three to four more years to master your painting and design skills,” Hamza said. “It takes at least 12 years to learn how to make art from scratch. At that point, you haven’t mastered it.”
Hamza was previously tasked with investigating text-to-image generators to see if they could adapt AI to concept art development for video game design, but despite the beautiful results “I wasn’t particularly impressed,” he said.
“There’s a lot of potential for creativity and brainstorming,” she said. “The more worrisome thing is that the AI isn’t as smart as we think it is, so I think it’s just mashing up many pieces of existing images.”
Artist Ljubica Todorovic, who also runs a framing business, said some artists fear AI will take the work from living artists.
But Todorovic said he wasn’t worried.
“AI cannot generate real physical paintings, and traditional art has value,” said Todorovic.
Todorovic added that the controversy over AI-generated art is very similar to how artists reacted when cameras were first introduced.
“The camera obscura was one of the first controversial things to come out in the 1600s,” said Todorovic, adding that digital devices like drawing tablets in the 1990s were also under discussion.
read more:
Meet Ida, the first robot that can paint like an artist
Todorovic said he also has concerns about the ethics of making and profiting from AI-generated art.
She believes that for ethics and for professionalism, artists who use AI to generate images (building on and adapting existing images created by other artists) must attribute to the original source. and said it should be made clear that the drawing was generated by AI. .
Hamza said he doesn’t allow AI to replace real artists on the professional stage, partly due to copyright issues.
“A big part of my industry dilemma is that I can’t claim these images until I know what the source is,” Hamza said.
In Canada, authors cannot copyright works that are entirely AI-generated because they are not human-generated works, said Caryce Craig, a professor at the University of York’s Osgood Hall Law School. I’m here.
“Canadian copyright law currently only protects human-created works as original works of expression,” said Craig.
“This means that authors must exercise skill and judgment in expressing their ideas.”
Craig says AI’s ability to process data and create digital art is not the skill or judgment of an author that fits the definition of copyrightable work.
Writers and artists are encouraged and rewarded by the copyright system to create cultural works, Craig said, because copyright law only protects works created by humans.
“When we’re talking about whether this should be copyrighted, we’re not talking about whether it’s good art or bad art,” said Craig. “Copyright is about giving an individual control, exclusive control over a work, so that no one else can make or copy it.”
She thinks AI-generated drawings are “great to look at”, but says there is “no reason” to protect AI-generated works under copyright law.
“In my view, art is more than machine-generated images. It’s an exercise in human creativity and human expression,” she said. “I think it’s very important to remember that what machines are doing is very different from what human artists and operators are doing.”
read more:
‘Not ready’: Russia uses artificial intelligence, deepfakes in propaganda war
For Shana Patry, an AI-generated image could serve as a reference image for her creation. This is the image that artists use to understand what a real object should look like.
Patry, a full-time artist from Saguenay, QC, told Global News that AI-generated images will be a “huge time-saver” for artists, helping them brainstorm ideas and explore different compositions. He says he is.
“Artificial intelligence can create reference images for painters and artists very quickly,” said Patry. “These images include perceptions of consistent light sources, color harmonies, reflections and reflected light, etc.”
Patry used an AI-generated image for one of her traditional oil painting works. She said paints, canvases and textures were things she couldn’t imitate with AI.
She believes there is always room for the artist because “artwork first exists in the artist’s head as a concept or idea before it is painted on canvas.”
“AI helps define that vision in a clearer, more concrete way,” says Patry. “Creating AI images still requires the brains of an artist. Generators can’t do anything unless they are told what to do, so it’s all about the idea and the artist behind it.”
.
Comments
Post a Comment